YEARS
Hublikar said before the court that Justice Gogoi unduly interfered in a decision… He has made my life miserable. Hublikar said before the court that Justice Gogoi unduly interfered in a decision. They have made my life miserable. However, the court was not inclined to accept this petition. The bench said that we are going to impose costs. Do not take the name of any judge. There is nothing in your case. Hublikar protested without any fear, saying, ‘At least I should get justice before my death.’ However, the bench reiterated its decision and said that sorry, we cannot interfere. Your petitions are rejected.
The Supreme Court witnessed a heated argument between judges and a petitioner over a petition seeking investigation against former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi. Ultimately the Supreme Court bench called security and asked the plaintiff to be taken out of the courtroom. The case was heard by a bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, who ultimately dismissed the petition filed by Arun Ramachandra Hublikar. The bench expressed disappointment over the repeated applications filed by Hublikar. Justice Trivedi commented that we are going to end it. Hublikar, a lawyer by profession, in his petition called for an in-house inquiry against Justice Gogoi. In this, the former CJI was accused of interfering in the decision related to the illegal termination of Hublikar. He argued that Justice Gogoi’s actions have adversely affected his life.
Hublikar said before the court that Justice Gogoi unduly interfered in a decision… He has made my life miserable. Hublikar said before the court that Justice Gogoi unduly interfered in a decision. They have made my life miserable. However, the court was not inclined to accept this petition. The bench said that we are going to impose costs. Do not take the name of any judge. There is nothing in your case. Hublikar protested without any fear, saying, ‘At least I should get justice before my death.’ However, the bench reiterated its decision and said that sorry, we cannot interfere. Your petitions are rejected.
The controversy escalated when Justice Trivedi directed the security personnel to escort Hublikar out of the courtroom. Despite repeated warnings, Hublikar continued to argue, even questioning the court’s refusal to issue notice. Madam, you are being unfair against me, he claimed, before security intervened. This was not the first time Hublikar had clashed with the judiciary. Earlier, in the hearing held on September 30, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, who was presiding over the case, had expressed strong objection to the inclusion of Justice Gogoi’s name in the list of parties and directed Hublikar to remove the name.
other news
