YEARS
The High Court had given a big decision in this case on August 1 and rejected the objections of the Muslim side and considered 18 petitions of the Hindu side as fit for hearing. The court also rejected the objection of the Muslim side against Order 7 Rule 11.
The trial of the cases on Mathura’s Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah Mosque dispute started today. A single bench of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain of Allahabad High Court is hearing the case. Let us tell you, the High Court had given a big decision in this case on August 1 and rejected the objections of the Muslim side and considered 18 petitions of the Hindu side as fit for hearing. Also, the court rejected the objection of the Muslim side to Order 7 Rule 11.
Hindu litigants file caveat in Supreme Court in Mathura temple-mosque dispute
Hindu litigants have filed a caveat in the Supreme Court seeking a hearing if the Muslim side challenges the recent order of the Allahabad High Court, which dismissed a plea against the maintainability of 18 cases related to the temple-mosque dispute in Mathura. The caveat has been filed through advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain to ensure that no ex-parte order is passed against Hindu litigants if the other group moves the apex court. A caveat application is filed by a litigant to ensure that no adverse order is passed against him without a hearing. On August 1, the high court had dismissed a plea challenging the maintainability of 18 cases related to the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura, and ruled that the religious character of the mosque needed to be determined.
Cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute are hearable
Earlier, the Muslim side had challenged the maintainability of the suits filed by the Hindu petitioners and the deity on the ground that they were barred under the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991. The court had said that all the 18 petitions filed by the Hindus would be heard together from August 12.
Other News
